![chandragupta maurya serial dated 25th june 2019 chandragupta maurya serial dated 25th june 2019](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1AA82OInQqk/mqdefault.jpg)
The total reduction done by these British scholars, from Jones to Smith, comes to 1300 years according to some Indian chronologists. He could not however get over, as if by compunction, to follow the Puranas in the enumeration of the kings and their dynasties. He took the aid of numismatics in addition to epigraphy. Smith took the chronological identity asserted by the predecessors in this historical hierarchy as the basis for further calculation of the exact dates of the different dynasties that ruled over Magadha after and before the Mauryas. Max Mueller in a letter but did not receive a reply from him. Troyer did not agree with this conclusion and noted this fact in the introduction to his translation of Rajatarangani of Kalhana. 320 BC, the date of coronation of Chandragupta Maurya as the Sheet Anchor of Indian history. Max Mueller, in 1859 AD, finalized this identity of Sandrokottas with Chandragupta Maurya and declared c. It is on this date that every other date of Indian history has been constructed. 320 BC was fixed as the date of coronation of Chandragupta Maurya. Princep's research decides the approximate date of Asoka, the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya as in 3rd century BC Both these dates were adjusted with the reign periods of the three successive Magadha kings, Chandragupta, Bindusara and Asoka of the Maurya dynasty given in the Puranas. In the Greek accounts, Sandrokottas of Palimbothra is described as a contemporary of Alexander of Macedonia who invaded India during 327 BC to 323 BC This decides the approximate date of Chandragupta Maurya. In 1838, Princep found five names of the Yona kings in Asoka's inscriptions and identified them as the five Greek kings near Greece belonging to third century BC who were contemporary to Asoka. The inscription bearing the name of Asoka was not found till the time of Turnour. Turnour, another employee of the Company in Ceylon, found in the Ceylonese chronicles that Piyadassana was used as a surname of Asoka, the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya. James Princep, an employee of the East India Company, deciphered the Brahmi script and was able to read the inscriptions of Piyadassana. Later scholars took this identity of Sandrokottas with Chandragupta Maurya as proved and carried on further research. Jones died just a year after this declaration and possibly before his death, could not know that Puranas have another Chandragupta of the Gupta dynasty. He, then, declared that Sandrokottas of the Greek accounts is Chandragupta Maurya of the Puranas. Jones took Palibothra as a Greek pronunciation of Pataliputra, the Indian city and capital of Chandragupta. According to the Greek accounts, Palibothra was the capital of Sandrokottas. Jones picked up one of these three names, namely, Sandrokottas and found that it had a sort of phonetic similarity with the name Chandragupta of the Puranic accounts. Xandrammes of the previous dynasty was murdered by Sandrokottas whose son was Sandrocyptus. Attributing one name each for the three kings the names are Xandrammes, Sandrocottus and Sandrocyptus. It mentioned seven names of three successive Indian kings. These accounts supplied some information about India of the time of the Macedonian king Alexander. He tried to search the Greek and Roman accounts. Sir William Jones could not believe in the antiquity of the Bharata War according to Indian accounts because of his Christian faith which told him that Creation took place at 9-00 a. How Chandragupta Maurya was Equated with Sandrocottus – Sheet Anchor Chronology. When European Indologists were groping to date Indian history during the nineteenth century (after having arbitrarily rejected the various Puranas), the Megasthenes account came in very useful.
![chandragupta maurya serial dated 25th june 2019 chandragupta maurya serial dated 25th june 2019](https://www.tellychakkar.com/sites/www.tellychakkar.com/files/styles/display_665x429/public/images/story/2019/07/22/chandra.jpg)
McCrindle: Ancient India as Described by Megasthenes and Arrian). Schwanbeck in the nineteenth century, and this compilation is also available to us in English (J.M. These quotations were meticulously collected by Dr. However, during the time it was available, many other Greek writers quoted passages from it in their own works. The manuscript Indika is lost, and there is no copy of it available. It is not clear how many years Megasthenes stayed in India, but he did write an account of his stay, titled Indika. He was stationed in "Palimbothra", the capital city of the kingdom. to the court of the Indian king whom he and the Greek called "Sandrocottus". Megasthenes was the Greek ambassador sent by Seleucus Nicator in c.